P A R T   -   2

C H A P T E R   -   1 7

M O R E   M A N P O W E R   A N D   R E O R G A N I S A T I O N

The  second terms  of reference  of the  Commission  is , “ to  recommend    measures  which may  be adopted for  preventing  the  recurrence  of  such incidents ” that  took  place  during  November  1984  riots  in  Delhi  and Kanpur as  also  within Bokaro  and Chas  Tehsils.

The  Commission  has found that the November riots occurred broadly on account of :

  1. (i) So  far  as  Delhi  is concerned , the  total  passivity, callousness  and indifference  of  the  Police in the  matter of controlling  the  situation and protecting  the  people  of the  Sikh  community  within the  Union Territory.
    (ii)  So  far  as  Kanpur  City ,  Bokaro  and  Chas  Tehsils  are  concerned ,  delay  in  taking  effective  steps  and  the  [police  not  being  as  effective  as  it  should  have  been.

  2. (I)  Delay  on  the  part  of  the  Delhi  Administration  in  calling  the  Army  to  stand  by  and  to  aid  and  assist  it  for  controlling  the  situation :
    (ii)  Delay  on  the  part  of  the  District  Administration  in  calling  in  the  Army  at  Kanpur.

  3. Improper  assessment  of the situation by the  civil  administration  at  all  the  places  of  inquiry  and inadequate  arrangements to face  the  challenging  situation at  each place.

  4. Lack  of  control  over  the  anti-social  elements  and  allowing  them to  combine, form  themselves  into  riotous  groups  and taking  over control  of the situation at  Delhi  form  almost  three  days,  at  Kanpur  for  one and  half  days  and  at  Bokaro-Chas  for  a  few hours.

  5. Identification without  least  justification of  the entire  Sikh community  with  the  two assassins  of  Smt. Gandhi.

Before  the  Commission, the  Delhi Administration took  the stand  that  it had  an inadequate  police  force;   the  Kanpur  Distt.Administration  took the stand  that  its police  strength  had  been depleted  on account of  deputation  of  a sizeable part of it to  Allahabad  and Hindu  Sikh  riots being unprecedented,  the  police  and the Distt. Administration were not in  a position  to comprehend  the  size and the  nature of  the  riots  that  followed. The   Commission  has found  that the police  at  Delhi  showed  total  passivity  and  callous  indifference  when  called  upon  to perform  its duty.  The  conduct of  the  Kanpur police  though  some  what  better, certainly  failed to  reach  the  professional standard.  At  Delhi  and  Kanpur  the  respective  administrations  canvassed  before the  Commission  that  on  account  of  the  strength  of  the  riotous  crowds  far  exceeding  that  of  the  police,  the  police could  not  rise to the  occasion  and meet the  situation.  The  Commission  has not been  in  a position  to accept  this  stand  as  a sufficient  cause for  the conduct  exhibited  by the  police during  the riots.  The  ultimate  conclusion of the  Commission has been  that  what  mattered  was not  the number  but the will and  timely  action. At  Delhi  this  appeared  to  be totally  lacking.

Both at  Delhi  as also at Kanpur  within  the  cities  there are  cantonments  where  Army  units are  posted.  The plea  taken by  the Commissioner  of  Police  at  Delhi  was  that  sufficient  number  of  Army personnel  was not available. It is a fact that  several  brigades  from the  neighbouring  cantonments  had to  be moved  there  which  took  some  time. At  Kanpur  there was  no  necessity  to move  more  Army  men from outside  but  the U.P.  Government  as also  the Distt.  Administration of  Kanpur  took  the  stand that the strength  of  Army  personnel  available  at Kanpur was not  adequate.  This  aspect  has also  to be taken into account.

  The  number of law  abiding  people  in the  community  is  gradually  getting  reduced  for  reasons  which are more than one. It is not  possible for any  community  to have as many policemen  as people  in the community. How  difficult a  situation of that type would be  can  be well   imagined if  India  with a population of  75 crores of people would be required to have an equal  number  of policemen for the purpose of control. Then who  will control the police  will  be  an  aspect for  consideration. Methods  of effective control with the  minimum strength  of the police  have,  therefore,  to be found out.

 Anti -Social   content in the community  is on the rise. One of the  effects of   modern  civilization  and  particularly  industrialisation,  is the  increase in the number of  anti-social  population.  During any  riot  this  action of the society jumps  into the fray  to fish in  troubled waters.  Once a  hestile  cutburs  begins  and people  become  aware  that there is  a  crack in the  social order  that is  conducive  to the  expression  of  hostility,  an  interesting  phenomenon  takes  place.  A  rash of hostile action appears many  of them  motivated  by  hostilities  which are not  related to  the conditions  or  strains  that gave rise top the  initial  outburst of  hostility.  This building  up effect  in which  individuals  capitalise on the fact  that  an outburst  has   occurred, in  a hostile crowd situation generally leads to  riotous  action. That is exactly  what seems to have happened  during October-November 1984. The  complaint of the  victims  that the men in the  riotous  crowds were not  mournful but  appeared  to  be in joyful mood and  temper  while  engaging  themselves  in criminal activity  supports the statement.  Both effective  and efficient  control of the anti-social  elements is necessary to  keep the community  on even  keel and  avoid  recurrence  of such riots.

  More  important than this  and  a  lasting solution would be  to render proper  attention to the people at large  which would bring them up  as ideal citizens  trained  to  tolerate  differences ,  prepared,  to  accept the  philosophy  of   ‘live and let live ’,  respect each others’   religion  and foster  universal  fraternity.  Government would not  be in a position to undertake  the job of training  everyone  in the  community and,  therefore, it has to be  a people’s  movement  and the  mass media  has to be  used in  a  proper way to fulfill this objective.

  The forces  that order  the life of a small community  make the policemen’ s  task  much easier  instead of  imposing  requirements ,  the policemen has  only to   lubricate  the  mechanisms  inherent  in social relations and police action is needed  only when  the informal controls  have proved  insufficient.  The  bigger  a society  becomes,  the weaker itself  policing   elements  are likely to be .  In the first place, when people are involved    with those  whom they are unlikely to meet again, there may seem to  be  less  reward  for honest  dealing  and if one party feels that  he has been cheated, there is a less chance of his being able  to bring informal pressure  to bear  upon the offender. Most  contacts are  impersonal and since the parties  do not  meet in other capacities,  the  informal  controls  cannot play  so great a  part. In the second place,  in the larger community the man to man level  for meeting  does not take place and, therefore, personal relationship does not  at all counts.

 In a  modern  cosmopolitan city with  a large population drawn from different communities with divergent  attitudes,  customs, habits and way  of life there is no social  cohesion.  Great  disparities of  education opportunities  and wealth exist. The growth of population has made life  competitive  and  there is constant  clash of interest. In industrial  towns peace is disturbed  every now and then on account of  continuous friction between employer and the  workmen.  The new generation have no  acquaintance with the great traditions  of India.  Cultural  cohesiveness  has  become  a  myth of  the past. Social control  over the  individuals is almost lost. In such a society every  differences  is likely to generate friction. Friction gives rise  to clash  an unrest  and disturbs  social peace and  tranquillity.  The demand   for police  attention in such a society  has, therefore, increased almost  hundred-fold.

  This  problem is  a universal one. Even in a  country like England  where freedom has prevailed for many centuries, the standard of living is fairly high, education is widespread, the country is not large in size, the population explosion is not unusually high and until only a few decades  back  economic prosperity prevailed, there   has been a steep  rise in crime rates.  Taking England  and Wales  together  as shown  in   Ben Whitaker’s .“ The  Police in society” (1979 Edn.), there used to  be 1,00,000 crimes  on the annual  average  between  1900  and 1919. By   1947  soon after the  II  World  War,   the rate of annual crimes had reached  5,00,000. By  1971, the figure  touched  17,00,000  and by  1978, 26,00,000. The  crime digest shows that figure in   1983  was  31,00,000.  As  in  England  so  in India,  there is a menacing  rise  in crime rates. Many of these crimes  have serious  social impact.

 From  the  figures  quoted  below  ( collected  from  the  Delhi Administration ) the  position  of  crime  rate   at  Delhi  on  annual  average  is  not  different:

YEAR MURDER ATTEMPT TO MURDER THEFT TOTAL OF ALL VARIETIES OF OFFENCES
1960 57 42 5,525 10,289
1970 123 135 18,011 31,269
1980 186 264 22,260 37,586
1985 312 267 13,763 30,412

The  Commission  has  elsewhere  in  this  Report  indicated  the  rise  in  the  population  of  Delhi.  When  analytically  compared  it clearly  appears  that  the  crime  rate  shows  as  steep  a  rise  as  the  population. 

Delhi  has  been  one  of  the  world ’s  fastest  growing  cities .  The  annual  rise  on  an  average  is  about  5% .  The  city  limits  have  also been  fast  expanding. As already  noticed Delhi  had  63  police stations  and 25 police  posts  in November 1984. Proposal for expansion  was  long  pending but no concrete action had been  taken. After  the riots  the  inadequacy  has been realised  and for  the  present  in  a  phased  manner  twelve  new  police  stations  have been sanctioned and by now all of them have been opened.

 The  Delhi  Police requires both  quantitative  and qualitative  expansion.  In  a  traditional community  the auto-lubricating  system of  policing  works. Such  is  not the position  in Delhi. The  outlying and less  populated  areas  require  more of  police  attention. The  growing  population justifies  more of  police  personnel too.  The entire  Union Territory  is getting  urbanised . In another decade,or, at any rate by the close of the century,the   entire  Union Territory of Delhi is perhaps going to  have  a  population  of 1.5 crores.  150  police stations on the basis  of one police station for  a lakh of person  may be the sound basis. Under  every  police  station there should  be one or two police posts  depending   upon the  local  requirements. Where  the  area  of the  police  station  is compact and well-knit,depending  upon past experience, one police  station for  1 lakh  or even  1,25,000  resident may  perhaps  work  efficiently.  Where  the area is  spread  out  but the population is not dense there should  be  a police station on the basis of either 8 sq.km. or population of 75,000. Each  police Station   should have  an Inspector as SHO  as at present and there should  be another Addl. SHO. ,  10  Sub-inspectors,  15 Asst. Sub-Inspector, 20 Head  Constables  and  100  Constables  for  every  police station.  These  are  details  which have to be worked out by the Administration.  The  posts of ASI  and Head-Constables  should  be filled up by promotion  from Constables  and at the stage of  recruitment of  constables full attention should be given  for recruiting people of  physical  ability, mental  capacity, alertness, serviceability and the like.  Exhibition of a pronounced  sense of duty  should  be one of the  qualifications.

 The  Inspector  should be a person with leadership and capacity to rise to the demands of  any occasion. He should be fit enough to ultimately  bear the  en tire responsibility  of the residents  within his charge  so far as law and order is concerned.

 The  functioning of the Delhi police requires  change and improvement. It should have a Metropolitan city set-up   and not  a  State  set-up. In  1978, the system of  Commissioner of Police  was introduced  with a view to  giving it  functional  autonomy.  But it has not worked  up to expectations  on account of  multiplicity of  authorities  as also  interference and  pressure  from different  sources, particularly  in the field  of maintenance of law and  order. Though  multifarious  powers are  vested in the Commissioner of Police even by  statute, he does not have freedom  to  exercise  his authority  by taking independent  decisions all by himself. Perhaps,  if the  Commissioner of Police  enjoyed the freedom  the riotous situation  could   have been  averted  or brought  under control  more quickly.

 In the  Union Territory the  administration  is  headed  by  the  Lt.  Governor.  There  is  a  Chief  Executive   Councillor  and  there  exists  a  Metropolitan  Council .  Matters  relating  to  law  and  order  are  discussed  in  the  Council;  the  Chief  executive  Councillor  at  his  level  also  looks  into  the  problems .  The  Commissioner  of  Police  is  subject  to  the  administrative  control  and  is  answerable  to  the  Home  Secretary .  As  already  noticed  by  the  Commission,  very  often  or  perhaps  always  the  Home  Secretary  is  a  junior  officer  of  the  Indian  Administrative  Service  while   the  Police  Commissioner  is  a  very  senior  officer   of  the  Indian  Police  Service .  This  gives  rise  to  a  lot  of  administrative  problems  and  embarrassment .  In  the  Delhi  Administration  there  is  also  a  Chief  Secretary .  Delhi  being  a  Union  Territory  and  being  the  capital  of  the  country  where  the  seat  of  the  Central  Government  is  situate ,  the  Ministry  of  Home  Affairs  of  the  Union  Government  plays  a considerable  part  in  the  functioning  of  the  administration .  The  agencies  to  oversee  the  law  and  order  situation  in  the  Union  Territory  thus  appear  to  be  too  many  and  if  the  maintenance  of  law  and  order  has  to   be  made  functional , the  number  of  agencies  should  be  reduced  and  the  effective  control  should  be  left  in  the  hands  of  the  Police  Commissioner  and  he  should   be  held  accountable  to  the  Lt.  Governor  directly  subject , of  course  ,  to  the  constitutional  scheme  of  being  overseen  by  the  Union  Government .    The  problems  of  law  and  order  require  quick  attention  and  the  bureaucratic  control  has , therefore ,  to  be  reduced  by  accepting  a  functional  approach  and  the  personal  responsibility  of  the  Commissioner   of  Police  as  the  administrative  and  functional  head  of  the  police  force  should  be  increased .

 There  is  rapid  expansion  of  residential  areas  within  the  Union  Territory .  Several  new  areas  have  been  coming  up  like   Trilokpuri  and  Kalyanpuri  in  the  East  District .  Sultanpuri  and  Mangolpuri in  West  District .  These  new  colonies  bring  in  tremendous  increase  of  population  and  require  lot  of  police  attention.   Not  being  fully  developed  areas  for  habitation  there  are  several  problems  which  would  not  exist  in developed  areas  and  in  the  absence  of  police  intervention  disturbed  situations  very  often  crop  up .  For  policing  in  these  areas  special  attention  becomes  necessary .

 The  Police  Commissioner  should  be  left  exclusively  in charge of  law  and  order and  should  not  be  burdened  with  other  duties  like  attention  on  dignitaries ,  of being  present  at  the  airport  to  receive  and  see  off  important  persons  from  abroad visiting  Delhi ,  attending  meetings  not  connected  with  law  and  order ,  and the  like  .  For  this  purpose  and  other  aspects  which  the  Police  Commissioner  is  required  to  perform  either   by  statute  or  under  administrative  rules and  directions ,  an  Addl.  Police  Commissioner  should  be  kept  in  charge .  Every  Range  or  police  district  should  be  in  charge  of  an  Addl.  Commissioner  and  he  should  have full responsibility  at  his  level  for  the  maintenance  of  law  and  order.  Past  experience  shows  that  there  certain  parts where  there is  always  smoke  and  fire  is  apprehended  any  time .  That  being  the  situation ,  greater  attention  should  be  given  to  those  areas  and  the  police  should  be  called  upon  to  play   their  role  not  only  when  trouble  starts  but  throughout  the  year  to  ensure  local  coordination  and  elimination  of  sensitiveness  and  continued  prevalence  of  normalcy .  The  Addl.  Commissioners  at  the  Range  level  should  have  effective control over  the  DCPs  below  them  as  also  the  ACPs  and  SHOs .  Apart  from  the  hierarchical  discipline ,  a  moral  force  and  impact  should  be  build  up  to  regulate  the  relationship  of  the  police  authorities .

 There  should  be  more  frequent  meetings  between  the  Addl.  Commissioner  at  the  Range  level and  his  officers  up  to  the  SHO so that every  development  of  any  consequence  should  be  within  the  direct  knowledge  of  the  Addl.  Commissioner .  Such  meetings  where  the  problems  are  discussed  would  not  only  help  briefing  the  Addl.  Commissioner  in  every  important  matter  but  it  would  also  help  the  SHOs ,  ACPs  and  DCPs  to  be  aware  of  the  problem  as  also  the  reaction  of  the  authorities.     Keeping  up  such  constant  touch  would  generate a  feeling  of  acceptance  of  the  leadership  of  the  Addl.  Commissioner  and  a  rapport  between  all  the  officers  of  the  different  grades  and  levels  so  as  to  bring  about  the  right  atmosphere  for  effective  working . The  experience  of  1984 riots  shows  that  there  was  almost  total  lack  of  communication  in  many  areas .  Though  every  police  station  had  motor  vehicles  at  its  disposal  which  were  fitted  with  wireless  sets  for   contacting  the  police  control  room ,  there  was  very  poor  feeding  of  information  and  the  higher  officers  who  were  away   from  the  places  of  occurrence  had  no  knowledge  of   the  incidents.  The  Commissioner  has  found  that  this  situation  brought  about  a  lot   of  difficulties  in  monitoring  control .  A more  effective  system  of  communication  should  develop and   the  importance  thereof  should  be  emphasised  so  that  it  may  not  at  all  be   overlooked  at  the  appropriate  time .  Since  the  Union  Territory  is  not  a  very  large  area  and  is  smaller  than  many  districts  in  the  States , in  the  event  of  outbreak  of  trouble  of  any  intensity , taking  of  rounds  in  protected  vehicles, if  necessary ,  should  be  introduced .

 In  service   training  should  be  insisted  upon  and  made  compulsory .  It  should  be  strict , practical  and utility-oriented .  Acquaintance  with  modern  and  up-to-date  gadgets  as  also  handling  of  new  arms  should  be  developed  during  such  training . For  that  purpose  Delhi  police  should  have  actually  a  model  Police  Training  College as  also  a  Police  Training   School .  Up-to-date  facilities  should  be  available  in  these  institutions  and  greater  emphasis  should  be  placed  on  not  only  the  essential  training  but  also  equipping  the  officers  with  developed  means  of  control  and  policing .  New  techniques  of  controlling  riots  and  the  anti-socials  should  be  brought  honour  to  the  police  officers .  Frequent  exercises  should  be  conducted  to  test  the  efficiency  of  police men .  All  types  of  new  equipments  and  weapons  which  are  found  suitable  should  be  placed  at  the  disposal  of  the  police  officers  while  discharging  duty  at  sensitive  points .  The  Administration  must  not  grudge  expenditure.  Security  is  the  sine  qua  non    of  good  government  and  is  also  the  foundation  of  all  development .

 The  police  throughout  the  country  ,  and  within  the  Union  Territory  of  Delhi  in  particular  are  called  upon to  do  a  lot  of  miscellaneous  jobs .  It  is  a fact  that  during  the  British  regime  the  police  were  an  instrument  of  oppression  of  the  colonial  power  and  traditionally  were  loyalists  of  the  British  masters .  When  independence  came ,  the  police  force  in  India  practically  became  the  servant  of  the  people  .  Its  task  ceased  to  be  that  of  ruthlessly  maintaining  law  and  order  for  the  benefit  of  the  foreign  ruler .  While  maintaining  law  and  order  as  servant  of  the  democracy ,  the  police  in  free India  have  to  be  friends  and  guides  of  the  people .  They  have  to  counsel  for  better  and responsible  civic  life  and  have  to  monitor  social  activities  keeping   with  the  taste  of  the  nation  .  The  police  have  not  only  to  ensure  punishment   of  offenders  but  have  also  to  help live ,  guide and  counsel  the  offenders  so  that   today’s  offenders may  be  good  citizen  of  tomorrow .  These  are  challenging  problems  and  the  police  as  a  service  have  got  to  be  tuned  to  these  requirement  .

 Experience shows  that place like  Delhi and Kanpur  should have adequate  reserves not  only of armed police  but also  para-military forces. Even the  strength  of  manpower in the  cantonment  may  require to be increased. Recent  experience shows that the disharmony in society  has become the  order   of the day. Social  tension  has increased and  every  now and then  problems of great  magnitude occur which unless immediately attended to  and  contained  are likely  to have nation-wide reprecussions. Like fire, unless controlled  at the earliest, such  disturbances are likely  to  spread  and devour  every part of the country. Without  any loss  of time additional force available near  about may be  commissioned  and  made effective. The Commissioner agree with the principle accepted  by the  Union Government  that the Army  should not be  deployed   too  frequently  in civil disturbances  and, therefore, more of   CRPF  and  BSF  personnel should be posted around Delhi  as also  cities like  Kanpur. Riot  squad  with  modern  training should be available  in riot-prone areas.

 The  beat  system  should    not  only be  re-introduced but strengthened. Under  the direct  control  and  supervision  of  a  Sub-Inspector  attached  to the police station, two  or  four  constables  in a group   and properly  armed should  be on their regular beats. Several  offences  take place  in broad  day  light. Taking advantage  of the  fact  that the male member of the family is  an office-goer,  even in crowded  areas where there is a lot of movement serious crimes are committed. Beat system, therefore, should  not  only  be resorted to at  night but in certain areas  it should be continued  even during the day. The Constables  on beat  duty  should  be kept under watch and there should be proper monitoring. The Commission has  recommended separately  for building up  of a civil  protection force in every area. The beat  constables  must develop proper  rapport  with them  so that  they gather  information of incidents  taking place  in their areas  and with the help of the local  residents  they are  in a position to  exercise  their authority  in an effective  way.  The information so  collected should be passed  on to the police control  room in due  course  for such attention as the  information  may  deserve.

 At  the police  control room  a computerised system should  be introduced  and a set of   capable  people competent to  give instructions  and directions must always be available  to immediately  react  to information received  from different areas. A  squad  should be available  at the police control room with proper  transport  arrangement to reach any support without  loss of time to meet  any emergency. The police today are called upon to discharge very hazardous  jobs.  In the seventies,  as Whitaker  mentions, on the average  700  policemen per  year  received  injuries upon   assault  by the people in England and Wales. In  India the  figure  must be very high. In recent times, hundred  of policemen are killed  while  engaged  in  discharging duty. One of the demands of the  police  everywhere is provision of better conditions of  service  in  recognition of their occupational hazards. The  Commission is inclined   to agree  that there is merit  in the stand and Government  should consider  this  aspect  favourably  so that a better  outturn of performance can  be obtained.

 The  Commission is of the view that to  keep up  the  efficiency of the  Delhi Police, provision should be  made to transfer  officers of all  cadres  of the Police Service excepting Constables, Head- Constables  and  ASIs. In the case of these three categories, transfer should  be permitted  only when delinquency justifying  posting out  is  established. In order that  transfers may  be feasible, steps have to be taken to change the  Service  Conditions  and  perhaps a  combined card for the  police  in the  Union Territories  may be made. In order  that the  national  capital  may have an efficient, effective and  model  police force, good  officers  from the  State cadres  should  be brought  into  it  either on  deputation  or on permanent basis.

 The police should enjoy a  considerable  degree  of public confidence as also a measure of  real popularity.  As  Dr.  Michael  Banton  has pointed out :

“ A policemen  is  a kind  of  professional  citizen, administering  the  moral  standards  defined  and accepted  by his community .   .   .    .   .He  earns  public cooperation and esteem  by  the manner in which  he  exercises  good  judgement  in  performing  his duties, and the foundation  of his good judgement  is  an awareness  of the  public’s  point of view.  He is  a  Defender  of the  Peace, more than an  Enforcer of the  Laws, possessing  authority  as well  as power. His authority gives  him  the  willing  obedience  of the public, thus  including  a  moral element  which compels  obedience which  is not  necessarily  rightful  .  .   .  .  He  will suppress  his personal feelings in  disintegrating  troubles  to identify  with   his  Department  if  it  is  committed  to  professional  policing  and  has a  morality  of  its  own .  His  role  should  be  based  upon  the  moral  authority  of  his  office  rather  than  its  legal  powers. 

This  would  be  possible  only  if  the  police  is  free  from  political  interference .  Government  must realise  that  the  police  are  meant  to  serve  the  community  and  are  not  intended  to  be  used  for    serving   the  political  cause  of  the  party  voted  to  power .  The   delinking  must  take  place  so  that  the  morale  of  the  service  may  increase  and  the  police man  may  become  and  remain  accountable  for  discipline  of   the  force  to  its  authorities  and  to  no  other  agency .

Better  control  over  anti-social  elements  is an  absolute  necessity.  Surveillance  over  bad  characters  and  anti-social  elements  in  Delhi  is  very  out- moded  and  ineffective . Though  history  sheets  are   required  to  be  maintained  police-stationwise   and  each  District  is  supposed  to  keep   a  watch  over  the  bad  characters  living  within  the  district ,  the  system  has  remained  ;more  on  paper  and  there  is  hardly  any  effective  surveillance .  Many  of  the  bad  characters live  in  one  district  and  operate  in  another ;  others  even  live in  the  neighbouring  States  and  taking  advantage  of   the   geographical  location  they  find  it  easy  to  operate  here .  There  are  several  known  sensitive  spots where  almost  every  day  there  is  some  incident . Surveillance  at  the  police  station  level  is  totally  ineffective  when  the  anti-socials  operates  within  another  police  station .  The   anti-social  also  keep  changing  their  residences  with  a  view  to  avoiding  the  police  eye  as  also  for  exploring  new  areas  of  exploitation .  In  such   circumstances unless  control  is  centralised  it  is  difficult   to  meet   these  situations .  The  police  should  try  to  keep   the capital  of  the  country  free  from  anti-social  elements  to  so  far  an  extent  as  possible .   Real  and  adjudged  bad  characters  should  be  externed  from   the  capital  by  appropriate  legislation  and  by  exercise  of  statutory  authority .  Instances  where  the  police  are  found  to  have  joined  hand  with  anti-social  elements  should  be  drastically  dealt  with  and  no  mercy  should  be  shown  to such  police officer—high  or  low—and  repeated  conduct  on  more than   one  occasion  should  bring  about  dismissal  of  the  police  officer   from   service .  The  Commission  has  found  several  instances  of  police  joining  hands  with  anti-socials to  be  more  or  less  true  and  its   Investigating  Agency  has  also  recorded  similar  conclusions .  The  reputation  of  the  police  at  the  national  capital  cannot  be  of  such  low  order .

The  Commission  is  alive  to  the  situation  that  the  police  are  often  accused  of  aggravating  and  inciting  tension .  These  accusations  are  often  untrue ;  however ,  they  probably  arise  because  the  police  are  necessarily  constantly   involved   in  incidents  relating  to  public  order . Ordinarily ,  they  will be  blamed  by  certain  segment  of  the  society  for  what  they  have  done ;  and  they  will  be  blamed  by  another  segment  for  what  they  have  not   done .  Yet , there  are  occasions  when  both  or  all  segment  of  the  society  do  join  in  recognising  their  good  and  timely  act.